top of page

Mourning Wars 

       Iroquois

       Algonquin   

The Iroquois and Algonquians fought mourning wars to heal loss. Mourning wars were fought for captives. Those captured in mourning wars replaced the deceased in a community. A ceremony of violence and humiliation initated captives. Captives were "caressed" with clubs and  fire brands, had their finger nails torn out, were forced to dance. A community tortured its captives to assuage the grief of the bereaved and to assert the community's dominance over its foes. Captives were adopted by bereaved families. Initiation was over when captives sufficiently pleased their adoptive families. An initated captive was welcomed into the community as if they were the person they replaced.  

Likewise, a community initated captives by eating them. When adoption did not ease a mourner's grief, the captives were executed. Captives were adopted and addressed as "uncle" or "nephew," were given a death feast, were saluted and allowed to recite their war honors. There was still a ceremony of violence that ended with scalping, hot sand, and execution by knife or hatchet. The captives were skinned, cooked in kettles, and consumed into the community. 

 

19th century historian Francis Parkman's France and England in North America: The Jesuits in North America in the Seventeenth Century describes Iroquoian culture. Parkman describes an Iroquoian attack on an Algonquian hunting party in 1641 and the Iriquois' treatment of Algonquian captives: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Iroquois and Algonquians had practical and religious reasons for what they did to their captives. It was dishonorable for a captive to show pain. Torture avenged an agrieved community. But torture was also a way to test the strength and honor of potential adoptees. Captives were deemed weak when they responded to their torture. Torture was not an act, but a ceremony observed with religious solemnity. Even when captives were executed, a ceremony of violence announced their passing into the afterlife.

 

Cannibalism had a spiritual context. The northeastern indigenous believed in a war, sun, and fire god named Aireskoi. Aireskoi required human sacrifices to be eaten. According to one Jesuit account, captives were cooked over bonfires until sunise when Aireskoi could look upon the ceremony. Aireskoi worship explains why firebrands were used in ceremonies of violence. The northeastern indigenous were animistic. Animate and inanimate things had spiritual energies that could be consumed. Animistic beliefs explain the high standard of brutality in ceremonies of violence. A captive who endured a ceremony of violence with strength and fortitude could convey those qualities to his captors when served at feast. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indigenous animism relates to the spiritual purpose of mourning wars. Captives replenished a community's physical numbers. But to assauge mourners' grief, captives also replenished the spirit of the lost. A captive could be spared and adopted by a family. But a captive could also be executed and adopted by cannibalism. Indigenous culture allowed for both kinds of adoption to mean the same thing. Whether captives were taken in alive or dead, they were consumed physically, and by extension spiritually, into the community. 

 

To be sure, there was Wendigo Psychosis and The Good Twin. Wendigo was a demon that possessed indigenes to crave human flesh. Anthropologists study the phenomenon as Wendigo Psychosis, a severe mental disorder. The Good Twin was a god in the Iroquoian creation story. When mystics predicted famine, they envisioned The Good Twin holding an ear of corn and a human leg. Wendigo Psychosis and The Good Twin suggest that bioecological factors motivated cannibalism. Still, there is no recorded instance of the Iroquois or Algonquian people eating members of their own community. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cannibalism may well have been a prehistoric practice that predates mourning wars.

Cannibal rituals originated with the Iroquois. Indeed, "Mohawk" in the Algonquin tongue means "flesh-eater." The Iroquois were able to spread their culture along the many rivers that extend from Lake Ontario. In fact, many of the northeastern indigenous descend from the Iroquois. Mourning wars only developed from northeastern indigenous infighting.

 

The Iroquois and the Algonquian people used torture and cannibalism to maintain balance. Torture and cannibalism made enemies into community members. Torture was more of a physical induction, cannibalism a regulation of the supernatural.  Torture and cannibalism allowed a community to vent its grief. That no community appeared to eat its own emphasizes the importance of captives to community replenishment. Though bioecological or nutritional factors might explain some instances of cannibalism among the northeastern indigenous, they do not dismiss the greater contexts in which cannibalism occured. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mahican - Major Groups 

Pequot - Minor Groups 

16th century Algonquian  village of Pomelock (near present-day Gibbs Creek, North Carolina)

16th century Huron Iroquois village. (note similarity to palisaded Algonquin village).

They bound the prisoners hand and foot, rekindled the fire, slung the kettles, cut the bodies of the slain to pieces, and boiled and devoured them before the eyes of the wretched survivors. "In a word," says [the Algonquin woman who escaped to tell the tale], "they ate men with as much appetite and more pleasure than hunters eat a boar or a stag ..."

 

The conquerors feasted in the lodge till nearly daybreak ... then began their march homeward with their prisoners. Among these were three women, of whom the [Algonquian woman] was one, who had each a child of a few weeks or months old. At the first halt, their captors took the infants from them, tied them to wooden spits, placed them to die slowly before a fire, and feasted on them before the eyes of the agonized mothers, whose shrieks, supplications, and frantic efforts to break the cords that bound them were met with mockery and laughter ...

 

[The Iroquois arrive at their village with their captives]

 

[the torture was] designed to cause all possible suffering without touching life. It consisted in blows with sticks and cudgels, gashing their limbs with knives, cutting off their fingers with clam-shells, scorching them with firebrands, and other indescribable torments. The women were stripped naked, and forced to dance to the singing of the male prisoners, amid the applause and laughter of the crowd ...

 

On the following morning, they were placed on a large scaffold, in sight of the whole population. It was a gala-day. Young and old were gathered from far and near. Some mounted the scaffold, and scorched them with torches and firebrands; while the children, standing beneath the bark platform, applied fire to the feet of the prisoners between the crevices ... The stoicism of one of the warriors enraged his captors beyond measure ... they fell upon him with redoubled fury, till their knives and firebrands left in him no semblance of humanity. He was defiant to the last, and when death came to his relief, they tore out his heart and devoured it; then hacked him in pieces, and made their feast of triumph on his mangled limbs.

 

All the men and all the old women of the party were put to death in a similar manner, though but few displayed the same amazing fortitude. The younger women, of whom there were about thirty, after passing their ordeal of torture, were permitted to live; and, disfigured as they were, were distributed among the several villages, as concubines or slaves to the Iroquois warriors. Of this number were the [Algonquian woman] and her companion, who ... escaped at night into the forest ...

bottom of page